In a 774-page petition, the state stated: “A number of circumstances comparable to deaths on account of Covid-19, street site visitors accidents and even circumstances of suicide have been outrightly handled as homicide circumstances for the aim of the report.”
The state argued that these discrepancies had led NHRC to quote 52 murders, whereas 29 homicide circumstances had been lodged. It additionally disputed the allegations that 11 rape circumstances came about as a fallout of post-poll violence and stated that NHRC had didn’t outline what must be “post-poll violence” and due to this fact “has wrongly included incidents that are both pre-poll or have taken place a lot after 02.05.2021”.
The ballot outcomes had been declared on Could 2 and chief minister Mamata Banerjee took oath of workplace on Could 5.
The state stated “out of the 1,979 complaints obtained by the committee, 864 alleged incidents don’t even point out the date of prevalence”. It argued that among the many 1,115 incidents which have dates, 45% came about within the three-day interval between Could 2-5 and 9 p.c after Could 5.
It additionally stated that CBI has been tasked to probe the homicide and rape circumstances cited within the NHRC report, however eight of the 52 homicide circumstances within the report don’t say after they came about. The NHRC report additionally cited 17 rape circumstances however didn’t say when 9 of those came about. For tried rape, sexual assault and molestation, the NHRC report cited 82 circumstances out of which “69 circumstances don’t have any date of prevalence”, the state stated.
Borrowing the SC’s “caged parrot” phrase for CBI, the state argued, “Previous expertise within the state has proven that CBI can’t operate independently and is usually invoked as a device to persecute officers of the state authorities, public servants and representatives of the folks within the state. An trustworthy and neutral investigation can’t be anticipated from the CBI particularly within the context of the state of West Bengal.”
In its petition, the state added that there was “a robust chance that the CBI will take speedy steps to persecute public officers within the state for political good points beneath the guise of purported investigations and beneath the quilt of the impugned order”.